Ryan Dawson: «Британия злится на американскую свободу слова, Андрея Тейта и Substack»
Источник: https://www.ryandawson.org/p/britain-mad-about-american-free-speech
Краткое содержание
Эссе Доусона в защиту Substack и Андрея Тейта на платформе. Ключевое: не важно, нравится ли кому‑то Тейт — Substack это free‑speech платформа, монетизирующая и «хороших», и «плохих». Повод поста — статья Telegraph о том, что Андрей Тейт внезапно (по их словам) «взлетел» на первые места Substack, поднявшись до #3 в New Bestsellers и #2 в Rising News. По подсчётам эксперта Claire Venus (audience development consultant), при 1,1 млн подписчиков и средней конверсии в платные 3–5% Тейт получает минимум £165 000–198 000 в месяц; Substack как платформа — минимум £19 800/мес или £237 600/год со своих 10%.
Доусон: «Telegraph разозлена не из‑за денег, а из‑за политических взглядов Тейта. До вчерашнего дня никто в британской прессе не замечал его Substack». Он фиксирует: после публикации под видео Тейта появилась волна хейтеров с британскими часовыми поясами.
Обновление о братьях Тейт: с Тристиана сняли judicial control в Румынии; с Андрея — в первом деле, но пока не во втором; имущество возвращается; их адвокаты два дня назад наконец получили возможность допросить «Jane Doe», запустившую весь кейс. Уголовные обвинения периодически снимаются и появляются новые, но до суда не доходит — «они всегда не проходят проверку доказательств». В Великобритании дело против братьев дважды закрывали по отсутствию доказательств, после чего «решили расследовать расследователей» — полицию. Текущее: из реальных convictions у братьев только превышение скорости и налоговое дело.
Доусон о собственном опыте: его обвиняли в «отрицании Холокоста», «ненависти к евреям», «нео‑нацизме» из‑за критики Израиля; он отвергает все ярлыки: «я живу 20 из последних 23 лет в районах, где 99% не‑белые»; он дебатировал с ревизионистами Холокоста и «выиграл», не отрицает Холокост, но не согласен с тем, чтобы сажать за «5,9 млн» вместо «6 млн» — «люди, говорящие 271 тыс., — идиоты, но быть идиотом — не преступление». Он пережил «matrix attack»: потерял платёжных процессоров, соцсети, банки без обвинений в преступлении.
Завершение: приглашение подписаться на Substack Тейта и собственно его, анонс стрима по иранской войне с Attwood и Sulaiman в понедельник.
Значимость
Программная статья Доусона, защищающая принцип презумпции невиновности даже для фигур, лично ему не близких (Тейт — явный идеологический противник в вопросах гендера). Линия «matrix attack» — устойчивая рамка Доусона о том, что деплатформирование и деньги работают как расширенная судебная система. Контекст: повышение налоговой/политической активности UK vs. американский free speech — актуальная тема весной 2026 после разрывов между Вашингтоном и Лондоном по речевому регулированию.
🧾 Транскрипт (формат)
Britain mad about American Free Speech and Andrew Tate and Substack
Источник: https://www.ryandawson.org/p/britain-mad-about-american-free-speech
It doesn’t matter if you like the guy hate the guy have indifference or don’t even know who he is. Substack is a Free Speech Platform where anyone can write, do podcast and or videos.
They make money too by having Andrew on the platform. He has been on for years I don’t know why the British press suddenly noticed.
I guess because he shot up to number #1 and number #2 on some lists. At first it wasn’t even monetized he just had a Substack but no pay option. They just changed that sometime this year.
I am super Pro Substack and Pro Free Speech. My family and I could not exist without Substack. I’m blanket banned off everything but X. The three video platfroms Bitchute, Odysee, and Rumble don’t pay. Rumble used to but they use PayPal now and I am banned on that. There is still telegram but there is no way to earn money on that. However do join that chan https://t.me/ancreport
The telegraph article is mad because of his political views, let’s not kid ourselves. They didn’t even know he had a Substack until yesterday.
“Andrew Tate could be making mid-six figures on Substack and the newsletter platform’s literary luvvies are up in arms.
Despite posting on the platform for a number of years to little fanfare, Tate recently skyrocketed to number three on the “New Bestsellers” chart and number two on the “Rising News” chart – and experts estimate he’ll take home a minimum of £165,000 this month from the 1.1 million subscribers he has amassed on the platform.”
“While it’s unclear how many of his 1.1 million followers are paying, the numbers are likely substantial, according to Claire Venus, audience development consultant and Substack expert. “The leaderboards are based on top earners, so you can see the top of the income tree there by category,” she says. “I advise my clients that the average [conversion rate from free to paid subscribers] is between 3 and 5 per cent.”
By that estimate, Tate will make at least £198,000 each month, before Substack’s 10 per cent cut – meaning the platform itself could be pocketing at least £19,800 a month, or £237,600 a year, from his basic plan alone.”
They don’t even know what he is earning but are making guesses. What does it matter? What was the point of this article other than free advertising for Tate?
I noticed too in the comments on Tate’s channel that after this article there was a swam of haters nearly all British timezone coming over just to be nasty. The hate is real.
Tristian Tate just got removed from Judicial Control in Romania. Andrew had it removed from the first case but not yet the second. Their properties are being returned. Their lawyers finally got to question the Jane Doe who started this whole mess two days ago. Criminal charges have been getting dropped but then new charges are made. It is a never ended cycle of accusations but never any trials. They always fail the evidence test. In the UK they dropped a case TWICE for lack of evidence so they decided to investigate the police. That’s right investigate the investigators.
Currently besides a speeding ticket and tax evasion they have no criminal convictions. “Charged” just means accused. It is one of those double meaning words like the word “Sanction” which can mean both to constrict or to allow.
All of that is irrelevant. If they are guilty and a court of law determines that then fuck them both. But if you believe in the due process of law and the Bill of Rights and the Constitution then we presume innocent until proven guilty. It is a slippery slope to condemn people based on internet haters.
I myself have been accused of being a holocaust denier, a Jew hater, a neo-Nazi. All because of my criticism of Israel. I’m not a Nazi or racial supremacist of any kind. I choose to live in a areas for 20 of the past 23 years that is 99% not white. I’m not anti-Semitic and have never denied a holocaust. More than that I debated Holocaust revisionist and won. I don’t agree that that should be a crime. I totally disagree with jailing people for saying 5.9 Million. I don’t even agree that that is ‘denial’ either. The people saying 271k are morons. But being dumb/mislead is not a crime.
The point is Matrix attacks are real. I have lived through it myself. I lost payment processors. I lost social media. I lost banks. And I wasn’t even accused of a crime. Believe me I am sure they looked.
So just to give the middle Finger to the system here is Tate’s Substack. you can join free.
Andrew Tate I use traditional social media to spread hope. Here? I will only tell you the harsh brutal truth of the modern world.
However Id rather you join mine. I am now giving Live Streams to the paying members. But you can do both.
Iran War updates with Attwood and Sulaiman on Monday.